Need Second Opinion on Monitor Purchase
 
Notifications
Clear all

Need Second Opinion on Monitor Purchase  

  RSS

IraqCanada
(@iraqcanada)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
 

Hey everyone, I just put together a new setup with an XPS 13 9370 and the Aorus 2070 Gaming Box with help from the excellent resources here. Here's my dilemma: I want to upgrade to a higher refresh rate monitor than the 60Hz I'm using with my old rig, but I'm not sure what to do. I hear that you get better relative performance on eGPU with higher resolutions, so would it be worth it to invest in a 144Hz monitor at 1440 or should I stick with 1080? I guess the simplest question is, how close would framerates on 1440 be to the same settings on 1080 with this minor added boost of playing on higher resolution, generally speaking?
Thanks!

To do: Create my signature with system and expected eGPU configuration information to give context to my posts. I have no builds.

.

ReplyQuote
itsage
(@itsage)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 4 years ago
 

144Hz monitor at 1440 would be a nice option for the RTX 2070 Gaming Box. You reduce Thunderbolt 3 performance loss at the same time making the most of the RTX 2070. Even if you don't get 144Hz consistently it's a much smoother visual in games and during regular use vs a 60Hz monitor.

external graphics card builds
best laptops for external GPU
eGPU enclosure buyer's guide

 
2020 13" MacBook Pro [10th,4C,G] + RX 5700 @ 32Gbps-TB3 (Prototype eGPU Enclosure) + macOS 10.15.4 & Win10 1903 [build link]  


ReplyQuote
IraqCanada
(@iraqcanada)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
 

Alright, yeah, that's what I was thinking. I appreciate the input, thanks!

To do: Create my signature with system and expected eGPU configuration information to give context to my posts. I have no builds.

.

ReplyQuote
wimpzilla
(@wimpzilla)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 years ago
 

Most importantly, you should get a decent adaptive sync monitor.
Since Nvidia gpu now support adaptive sync, you get the best smooth gaming experience even if the monitor is not branded g-sync.

A decent 1440p, 144Hz adaptive sync panel with 40/144Fps range would be a must if you plan to plug directly the monitor to the gpu.

This post was modified 1 year ago

2012 13-inch Dell Latitude E6320 + R9 [email protected] (EXP GDC 8.4) + Win10
E=Mc²

 
2012 15" Lenovo Thinkpad T530 [2nd,4C,Q] + R9 270X @ 4Gbps-mPCIe2 (EXP GDC 8.4) + Win10 [build link]  


ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@iraqcanada, 144 Hz is not recommendable for eGPU setups. On high FPS the limited bandwidth plays a big role.  If you stay with standard FPS like 60 Hz or 72Hz you are good, but not above.

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680

 
2018 15" MacBook Pro (RP560X) [8th,6C,H] + RX 5700 XT @ 32Gbps-TB3 (ASUS XG Station Pro) + Win10 & macOS 10.15.4 [build link]  


ReplyQuote
Eightarmedpet
(@eightarmedpet)
Noble Member Moderator
Joined: 3 years ago
 

@oliverb dunno man, I get well over 60fps in most games and I’ve got a double bottleneck, so 144hz would make sense..

2017 13" MacBook Pro Touch Bar
GTX1060 + AKiTiO Thunder3 + Win10
GTX1070 + Sonnet Breakaway Box + Win10
GTX1070 + Razer Core V1 + Win10
Vega 56 + Razer Core V1 + macOS + Win10
Vega 56 + Mantiz Venus + macOS + W10

---

LG 5K Ultrafine flickering issue fix

 
2017 13" MacBook Pro [7th,2C,U] + RX 560 @ 32Gbps-TB3 (AKiTiO Node Lite) + macOS 10.15.4 & Win10 [build link]  


ReplyQuote
mac_editor
(@mac_editor)
Famed Member Moderator
Joined: 3 years ago
 
Posted by: OliverB

@iraqcanada, 144 Hz is not recommendable for eGPU setups. On high FPS the limited bandwidth plays a big role.  If you stay with standard FPS like 60 Hz or 72Hz you are good, but not above.

@oliverb this highly depends on the game itself, with the primary bottleneck being the Thunderbolt chip overhead and not the bandwidth as demonstrated here.

For example, I was able to achieve 200+ FPS on an RX480 over Thunderbolt 2 in Rocket League. A counterexample would be F1 2018 at any resolution High-Ultra settings. On TB3 + V64, I get good results (60+ easily at all times at 4K/2K). However with "rain" weather effect, even at 1080p the FPS seems to bottleneck at about 30~35. However, I did not test then, if it was a CPU bottleneck or not. Distinguishing CPU bottlenecks and the thunderbolt effect is important.

Nonetheless, w.r.t. gaming, we could say that for most modern titles, pushing out very high frames can be a challenge over Thunderbolt.

purge-wranglertbt-flashpurge-nvdaset-eGPU
Insights Into macOS Video Editing Performance

Master Threads:
2014 15-inch MacBook Pro 750M
2018 15-inch MacBook Pro

 
2019 13" MacBook Pro [8th,4C,U] + RX Vega 64 @ 32Gbps-TB3 (Mantiz Venus) + macOS 10.14.6 & Win10 [build link]  


OliverB liked
ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@eightarmedpet and @mac_editor, of course you are right and it depends highly on the game. In Portal, an older and perfect optimized game I get almost 300 FPS while in Forza Horizon 4 it's impossible to get over 80 FPS, no matter how low the settings.

It should more like a guideline (with exceptions): Newer titles though tend to be limited more, it looks as they send more data through.

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680

 
2018 15" MacBook Pro (RP560X) [8th,6C,H] + RX 5700 XT @ 32Gbps-TB3 (ASUS XG Station Pro) + Win10 & macOS 10.15.4 [build link]  


ReplyQuote