Enclosure & Hardware Discussions
Radeon VII compatible with Mac?
 

Radeon VII compatible with Mac?  

 of  19
  RSS

itsage
(@itsage)
Famed Member Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
 

@tsakal and @kelvin_tan I fully agree with you about RX Vega 56 being the best value atm. It’s half the price of Radeon VII and in macOS you’d hardly see the performance difference. We need better software optimization for multiple and external graphics cards.

@tsakal The Vega Nano + Gaming Box build has been working well. Sorry I haven’t got time to post a build guide for it. This Gaming Box was from the RX 580 eGFX. That card is now inside the Zotac AMP Box Mini. I forgot about this eGPU enclosure until now. Paired together with the 130mm fan on this Gigabyte RX 580 graphics card, it’s a remarkably quiet setup even at full speed.

This post was modified 7 months ago

Best ultrabooks for eGPU use

eGPU enclosure buying guide


ReplyQuote
screendor
(@screendor)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

Hmm.  @kelvin_tan .  Got the VII for FCPX.  That's a bummer.  Would love to see further tests.  I've got a full spec iMac 5K with 580--gpu crashes all the time.  Now, I do edit with 4K Pro Res footage and I do add color correction and some filters--and the crashes indicate it's the GPU so I thought the Radeon VII would be just the ticket.

2017 iMac 5K 4.2 GHz Intel Core i7 40 GB 2400 MHz
Internal AMD 580 Pro 8GB; Akitio Node Pro + AMD Radeon VII


ReplyQuote
itsage
(@itsage)
Famed Member Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
 

@screendor Have you checked the temp of your RP 580 when these crashes happen? As mentioned earlier, many software don’t make the most of multiple and external graphics cards so the performance gain isn’t always realized. In my Mac Pro trashcan, the dual D500 dGPUs complete BruceX in roughly 24 seconds. Adding the RX Vega 56 eGPU brought it down to sub 13 seconds. I’ve since tried Vega Frontier, WX 9100, and Radeon VII. There’s not really a difference in FCPX between these eGPU setups with the nMP.

We also need to keep in mind the overall balance of a system. Apple is good at this regarding their Pro Mac computers. No individual component is considered the top dog but the combination yields great results that’s just shy of diminishing returns.

This post was modified 7 months ago

Best ultrabooks for eGPU use

eGPU enclosure buying guide


screendor liked
ReplyQuote
screendor
(@screendor)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

Thanks @itsage .  Sadly, the 580 is internal to the iMac--it was part of a BTO purchase (although it was an Apple Refurb).  Given my headaches with GPU crashes, I've been thinking I'm just somehow overtaxing the system (4.2 GHz Intel Core i7, 40 GB 2400 MHz DDR4) and that a spanking new AMD card and Akito Node Pro would set me right.

Would love to hear what, if any, gains folks are getting with the egpu VII and FCPX.   Thanks for you sage counsel.

2017 iMac 5K 4.2 GHz Intel Core i7 40 GB 2400 MHz
Internal AMD 580 Pro 8GB; Akitio Node Pro + AMD Radeon VII


ReplyQuote
Kelvin Tan
(@kelvin_tan)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@itsage @screendor

Bruce X is the only FCP X benchmarking tool around, and it just tests exports with a standard set of effects. There are other tangible benefits with regards to playback, general system smoothness etc, but as @itsage mentioned, it is diminishing returns in FCP X, and really project dependent (my FCPX use is for personal projects consists mainly of simple cuts, titling, effects, etc).

On the other hand, Davinci Resolve is much better optimised for GPU. There are real and significant benefits to running Davinci Resolve with a strong GPU. It really depends on your use case. Since you gotten it why not run it, get a feel using your own projects, and see if it's worth keeping.

X1 Yoga Gen3, X1 Tablet Gen 3, MacBook Pro 15" 2018
Razer Core X / Mantiz Venus
Asrock Radeon VII, Zotac Nvidia 1080Ti Amp Core Extreme, Powercolor Vega 56 reference (flashed to V64 bios)


screendor liked
ReplyQuote
screendor
(@screendor)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@kelvin_tan .  Good advice, all things considered.  That said, any add'l benchmarks w/this card and FCPX greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

2017 iMac 5K 4.2 GHz Intel Core i7 40 GB 2400 MHz
Internal AMD 580 Pro 8GB; Akitio Node Pro + AMD Radeon VII


ReplyQuote
Kelvin Tan
(@kelvin_tan)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

Welp faced the first showstopper with the Radeon VII - in a Razer Core X the gpu fans goes to full blast when the Mac sleeps. It has been updated to bios 1.0.6, does anyone else have the same issue or is it a particular issue with the pairing in a Razer Core X? Or does anyone know how to solve it short of turning off or disconnecting the Razer Core X?

no such issues with the Vega 56 in the same enclosure.

X1 Yoga Gen3, X1 Tablet Gen 3, MacBook Pro 15" 2018
Razer Core X / Mantiz Venus
Asrock Radeon VII, Zotac Nvidia 1080Ti Amp Core Extreme, Powercolor Vega 56 reference (flashed to V64 bios)


ReplyQuote
Roedi78
(@roedi78)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 year ago
 

@kelvin_tan Same here with Sonnet Breakaway Box 650. And same with my former Vega64 w/ Sonnet BB.

MacBook Pro 15" Late-2016 w/TB 16GB with RP460 4GB
automate-eGPU EFI 1.0.5 USB w/DSDT override
 macOS Catalina 10.15 dev beta 3 w/Win10 (1903) BootCamp
Sonnet Breakaway Box 650 TB3 /wAMD Sapphire Radeon VII 16GB
 Alphacool Eiswolf 240 GPX-Pro AiO Radeon VII M02 Water Cooling


ReplyQuote
(@hans_wong)
New Member
Joined: 7 months ago
 

I am planning to buy Asus or Gigabyte Vega 64, I would like to know if these brands will work fine in MacOS? Thanks you in advance.

Pending: Add my system information and expected eGPU configuration to my signature to give context to my posts


ReplyQuote
Robin_Martin
(@robin_martin)
Eminent Member
Joined: 7 months ago
 
Posted by: screendor

@kelvin_tan .  Good advice, all things considered.  That said, any add'l benchmarks w/this card and FCPX greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

I’m hoping to see nice gains in FCPX as well. I’ll be putting my setup through it’s paces with some 8K RED footage this weekend and will report back.

Also, this may be obvious, but everyone has ticked the option in the Finder for Final Cut/Resolve/etc. to prefer the eGPU when running your tests, right?

2018 MBP i9, 32GB, Vega 20; Razer Core X, Radeon VII


ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 12 months ago
 
Posted by: itsage

@tsakal and @kelvin_tan I fully agree with you about RX Vega 56 being the best value atm. It's half the price of Radeon VII and in macOS you'd hardly see the performance difference. We need better software optimization for multiple and external graphics cards.

It's only a third the price. You get it for 250 EUR.

The best value, however, is a RX580 (4GB about 110 EUR, 8GB about 140 EUR).

This post was modified 7 months ago

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680


ReplyQuote
ikir
 ikir
(@ikir)
Prominent Member
Joined: 3 years ago
 

For being the first beta, I'm getting quite impressive results.

@oliverb
Here in Italy price are very different


MacBook Pro 2018 Touch Bar i7 quad-core 2.7Ghz - 16GB RAM - 512GB PCIe SSD
my Mantiz Venus extreme mod with Sapphire Nitro+ RX Vega 64


ReplyQuote
screendor
(@screendor)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

Total noob question.  Running the 10.14.5 beta with Akitio Node Pro + AMD VII.  First timer.  
Using FCPX, checked "prefer external GPU" option.  Menu bar now has the "Disconnect AMD RADEON VII." option.  Think it's working but the system profile still says Radeon Pro 580.  Although deeper in, the VII is shown as connected and available.

So--all good?  I was expected the system profile to show the VII and not the 580—although I have not selected to make my egpu-connected display my primary display.

Here's a quick screenshot.  Thanks for the help/confidence.

Screen Shot 2019 03 29 at 4.24.28 PM
This post was modified 7 months ago

2017 iMac 5K 4.2 GHz Intel Core i7 40 GB 2400 MHz
Internal AMD 580 Pro 8GB; Akitio Node Pro + AMD Radeon VII


ReplyQuote
crhendo
(@crhendo)
Active Member
Joined: 7 months ago
 

@kelvin_tan
 Same here. I have exactly the same problem with my 2018 Mac Mini and Razer Core X with Radeon VII. Sleep results in all GPU fans running flat out. Apart from that, very stable for a Beta release.

Mac Mini 2018 i7 64GB 1TB
NetStor HL23T-Plus, Radeon VII, Dell U3818DW
OWC 4M2 4x2TB Intel 660P, CalDigit TS3+
OWC Thunderbay 6 48TB, G-Speed Studio 40TB


ReplyQuote
tsakal
(@tsakal)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 year ago
 

@itsage
thank you for the update. Did you need to do any mods? Is the stock power supply and ventilation good enough for the v56 nano? 

Thanks in advance

when you have some time please post some pics

A. 2.7 GHz I7 4 Cores, 16Gb, 1TB MBP 13 2018 TB3 , EGPU Gigabyte Gaming Box RX580 8Gb

B. 3.1 GHz I7, 16Gb, 1TB MBP 13 2015 TB2 , EGPU Gigabyte Gaming Box RX580 8Gb


ReplyQuote
tsakal
(@tsakal)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 year ago
 
BFEF1B3B 0026 446C A6D2 4B6E5A27C7DE

see benchmark comparison between rx580 in black magic and gaming box ve the v56 and v64.
i have also compared fcpx but using different footage and the performance is similar to the average of the benchmarks. All are done using a mbp 13 2018. The only result that looks strange is my cinebench score with the gaming box but it does not seem to affect the other results. Based on this it seems to me that when using a tb3 connection the incremental gain going beyond v56 is limited. Although I believe that 16gb in frontier or vii could help with pro apps but cannot Test it.

A. 2.7 GHz I7 4 Cores, 16Gb, 1TB MBP 13 2018 TB3 , EGPU Gigabyte Gaming Box RX580 8Gb

B. 3.1 GHz I7, 16Gb, 1TB MBP 13 2015 TB2 , EGPU Gigabyte Gaming Box RX580 8Gb


ReplyQuote
screendor
(@screendor)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

FWIW, FCPX performs Bruce X in about the same time (15 secs) on the internal 580 vs the external VII.  That said, system stable, activity monitor confirms both GPUs working.  Fans never spin up so don't think I'm hardly taxing the VII at all.  Although have to spend more time working to see if I'm getting better performance.  But at least no crashes.

2017 iMac 5K 4.2 GHz Intel Core i7 40 GB 2400 MHz
Internal AMD 580 Pro 8GB; Akitio Node Pro + AMD Radeon VII


ReplyQuote
Juan C. Yunis
(@juan_c_yunis)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@screendor do you have an external monitor connected to the VII? if not, then system report will show the one device with the display connected, or the first one i guess. in my case, if i use the eGPU without a display connected system report will say intel GPU but then in the apps i could run them with the VII.

2018 Mac Mini Core i7 8700B 32GB RAM 512GB SSD + Razer Core X + AMD Radeon VII


screendor liked
ReplyQuote
(@arden_shibley)
Trusted Member
Joined: 8 months ago
 
Posted by: Kelvin Tan

@itsage @screendor

Bruce X is the only FCP X benchmarking tool around, and it just tests exports with a standard set of effects. There are other tangible benefits with regards to playback, general system smoothness etc, but as @itsage mentioned, it is diminishing returns in FCP X, and really project dependent (my FCPX use is for personal projects consists mainly of simple cuts, titling, effects, etc).

On the other hand, Davinci Resolve is much better optimised for GPU. There are real and significant benefits to running Davinci Resolve with a strong GPU. It really depends on your use case. Since you gotten it why not run it, get a feel using your own projects, and see if it's worth keeping.

I ran tests with Vega 64 of decoding XAVC-I, ProRes 4444 XQ, XAVC, and H.264 footage to a ProRes Proxy in Resolve and Adobe Media Encoder and found Media Encoder to be both faster and less work. More intuitive/flexible and it (AME) effectively maxed out the eGPU on all tests except the h.264.

On h.264 for example, AME was 5.7x faster than Resolve. Which is nuts. I prefer AME and wanted to see Resolve beat out AME for proxy generation (prepping files for NLE or for an editor) but it stood no chance. Maybe faster in the actual effects exports, but I'm not typically under a time crunch for those, and the timelines are only a few minutes. Where the eGPU matters is when a production hands me 250GB of footage on a card and the editor wants a full set of 1080p proxies to edit from, and I'm gonna get another 250GB card in a couple hours, so they'll add up if I can't keep up.

2018 15" MBP, 2.6GHz 32GB 1TB Vega Pro 20, Razer Core X, AMD Radeon VII (Waiting for OS X Drivers), MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 Wave


ReplyQuote
wimpzilla
(@wimpzilla)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 years ago
 

@ OliverB

The RX580 is an outdated gpu, it is not a good buy even if cheap.
If one want to buy a decent product from AMD at the moment, only the Vega 56/64 are a good buy, especially second hand.
The RX580 is not in any way or shape a good value, it's an outdated gpu for the nowadays standard and future applications!

That's why the Blackmagic RX580 is not a good buy if looking for a long lasting device!

2012 13-inch Dell Latitude E6320 + R9 [email protected] (EXP GDC 8.4) + Win10
E=Mc²


ReplyQuote
mar_kelp
(@mar_kelp)
Eminent Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@screendor If your external display is connected to the GPU card in the eGPU enclosure and displays an image, the Radeon VII is being used. It does not need to be set to primary. Your iMac's Radeon Pro 580 will still be used to drive the iMac internal display.

Under MacOS, you can see which GPU is being used using the GPU History feature in the Activity Monitor system app. Launch Activity Monitor and select GPU History from the Windows menu. Leave it running in the corner, then run your applications normally and see which of the bar graphs is showing activity. As a test, you can take a browser window playing video (like YouTube) and drag it between displays. You should see the GPU activity switch between the graphics cards in GPU History.

2017 13" MacBook Pro Touch Bar + RX 580 Gaming Box + macOS 10.14.3 and Windows 10 (BootCamp with rEFInd)


screendor liked
ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 12 months ago
 
Posted by: wimpzilla

@ OliverB

The RX580 is an outdated gpu, it is not a good buy even if cheap.
If one want to buy a decent product from AMD at the moment, only the Vega 56/64 are a good buy, especially second hand.
The RX580 is not in any way or shape a good value, it's an outdated gpu for the nowadays standard and future applications!

That's why the Blackmagic RX580 is not a good buy if looking for a long lasting device!

@wimpzilla,
you are aware of the fact that the release dates of RX580 and Vega56 are about the same? (within 3 months to be exact).
You are aware of the fact that both have 8 GB Ram in their biggest configuration?  (identical)
You are aware of the fact, too, that the benchmarks of a RX580 yield 60-70% of a Vega56?

If you are aware of those facts, I wonder why you call one outdated and the other not.
No, you weren't aware of those facts, you never had a decent RX580 (I had both btw), you are talking nonsense.

This post was modified 7 months ago

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680


ReplyQuote
Kelvin Tan
(@kelvin_tan)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@OliverB

I think your tone is unwarranted.

The rx580 is on the old GCN 4.0, whereas Vega 56 is GCN 5.0.

Even though both share the same memory size, due to HBM2, the bandwidth of the Vega cards is almost 60% more than the rx580, 409.6GBps vs 256GBps, with potential to increase even more.

The rx580 is a baseline card for gaming, 1080p60, but in modern games it is now struggling to reach that even, whereas the Vega cards are still performant.

Finally, want a free 10 to 15% performance boost? Just flash the Vega 64 bios and you come within 1 to 3% of a stock Vega 64. Undervolt and got Samsung memory? Push it to slightly beyond a stock Vega 64.

If you are doing video editing purely, at this stage in time the Vega 56 is definitely underutilized by software. Looking at the benchmarks comparison between the Blackmagic egpu (rx580 vs Vega 56), you'll notice that many benchmarks show more than 50% increase in performance, going from the Pro 580 to a normal Vega 56.

Buying a GPU is a matter of budget, choice and priorities, and whether to spend more or not. If you want to consider resale value too, the rx580 has a steeper percentage drop than the Vega cards.

I'm not for nor against the rx580 or whatever card, but to say someone is talking nonsense is just plain rude.

X1 Yoga Gen3, X1 Tablet Gen 3, MacBook Pro 15" 2018
Razer Core X / Mantiz Venus
Asrock Radeon VII, Zotac Nvidia 1080Ti Amp Core Extreme, Powercolor Vega 56 reference (flashed to V64 bios)


ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 12 months ago
 

@kelvin_tan,
I have chosen my tone exactly, because it was nonsense what he was talking.

Of course a Vega 56 is superior to a RX 580, but to say a RX580 was outdated and a Vega56 was up-to-date, is actually a big nonsense. Only the release dates say already otherwise.

Ad of course you can overclock an RX580, too... I had both cards and Vega56 is better, no doubt. But what he was saying about the RX580, is just not justified, especially compared to a hardly younger Vega 56

Such mis-information as the post of @wimpzilla cannot be left uncommented.

EDIT: That's not the first time, I remember when he didn't believe me a word, when I said nVidia drivers had an OpenCL problem. They have. He looks to me like a know-it-all, only he isn't. He didn't know that only 3 months were between the releases dates of those cards, but big words come easy.

This post was modified 7 months ago

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680


ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 12 months ago
 

Additional fact:
I said already that I had a Vega56 and a RX580. I made extensive tests with both cards and returned the Vega56 and kept the RX580 for the great value/money it represents.

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680


ReplyQuote
Eightarmedpet
(@eightarmedpet)
Noble Member
Joined: 3 years ago
 

Chillllllll guys, you’re talking about GPUs, not life saving surgery. 

Interesting to to hear a figure attached to the 56>64 bios flash, I’m tempted to give it a try, going to do some reading but if anyone wiser than me wants to rate it on a scale of 1 to 10 difficulty wise (for a noob) I’m listening...

2017 13" MacBook Pro Touch Bar
GTX1060 + AKiTiO Thunder3 + Win10
GTX1070 + Sonnet Breakaway Box + Win10
GTX1070 + Razer Core V1 + Win10
Vega 56 + Razer Core V1 + macOS + Win10
Vega 56 + Mantiz Venus + macOS + W10

---

LG 5K Ultrafine flickering issue fix


ReplyQuote
Eightarmedpet
(@eightarmedpet)
Noble Member
Joined: 3 years ago

ReplyQuote
Kelvin Tan
(@kelvin_tan)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 
Posted by: Eightarmedpet

Also, no issues running a flashed bios Vega in macOS?

It’s recognised as a Vega 64. Zero issues. Very easy to do, but it can only be done in Windows. You will gain a memory speed increase of 800mhz to 945mhz, and boost clock speeds will increase from 1474 to 1536. 

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/amd-polaris-vega-gpu-macos-support.2083168/

I used the Sapphire Nitro+ Vega 64 bios on my reference card. It’s pretty safe because the Vega cards all have dual bios, so you flash one, if anything goes wrong (rare), just flick the bios switch to the other, boot up, flick the switch while it’s running, and flash again.

make a backup of your original bios and keep it somewhere safe. If you are chasing even more performance you can edit the power play tables in MacOS.

https://www.tonymacx86.com/threads/tool-vgtab-control-your-vega-in-macos-without-flashing-the-vbios.268965/

I didn’t bother with this one as Mac is not really taxing the gpu much.

edit: recommended reading
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/8to0fz/vega_56_owners_that_flashed_their_bios_to_a_64/

edit2: check your card under windows using gpu-z to see if it’s Samsung ram. If it’s Hynix the 64 bios might not work. Before flashing just make sure 1) you know what memory you have 2) identify where is the bios swap switch 3) make a backup of your original bios.

This post was modified 7 months ago

X1 Yoga Gen3, X1 Tablet Gen 3, MacBook Pro 15" 2018
Razer Core X / Mantiz Venus
Asrock Radeon VII, Zotac Nvidia 1080Ti Amp Core Extreme, Powercolor Vega 56 reference (flashed to V64 bios)


ReplyQuote
Kelvin Tan
(@kelvin_tan)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

Back on the topic of Radeon VII, if anyone has any idea how to resolve the max fan blast on sleep/shutdown issue please let us know. Have reverted back to the Vega as it’s just not feasible to have to unplug or turn off the enclosure every single instance I walk away.

X1 Yoga Gen3, X1 Tablet Gen 3, MacBook Pro 15" 2018
Razer Core X / Mantiz Venus
Asrock Radeon VII, Zotac Nvidia 1080Ti Amp Core Extreme, Powercolor Vega 56 reference (flashed to V64 bios)


ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 12 months ago
 

Anyway, if you want a really powerful GPU, use a superclocked GTX 1080 Ti.

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680


ReplyQuote
(@peter_thaler)
Active Member
Joined: 8 months ago
 
Posted by: OliverB

Anyway, if you want a really powerful GPU, use a superclocked GTX 1080 Ti.

Agreed, GTX 1080 Ti > RadeonVII seems to be the current reality, and you have done a great job by proving it in numerous tests, all of which I enjoyed and am thankful for. Much gratitude for that. But maybe—and it seems to be noticed by others as well—sometimes you come across slightly aggressive, and it would be so cool if egpu.io could be supportive.  If you think someone is talking bullshit, don't just snap at them. Just humbly state why you think it's wrong. No need for hate. After all, most coming here, no matter what you think of them, are simply trying to figure out something that is still relatively niche.

Thank you for joining my TED Talk.

This post was modified 7 months ago

MacBook Pro (2017 13" Touch bar) Mojave 10.14.5 Beta / bootcamp Win10 1809 (+automate-eGPU EFI) - Mantiz Venus + AMD Radeon VII (Sapphire) - LG UHD 4k


ReplyQuote
themattod
(@themattod)
New Member
Joined: 7 months ago
 
Posted by: Kelvin Tan

Back on the topic of Radeon VII, if anyone has any idea how to resolve the max fan blast on sleep/shutdown issue please let us know. Have reverted back to the Vega as it’s just not feasible to have to unplug or turn off the enclosure every single instance I walk away.

Obviously not the long term solution you're looking for, but how about setting your computer to never sleep?

Pending: Add my system information and expected eGPU configuration to my signature to give context to my posts


screendor liked
ReplyQuote
Kelvin Tan
(@kelvin_tan)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

@themattod

Did that for a year+ when my Mantiz Venus and mbp 2016 refused to sleep properly. At the end of it the batteries were bloated and bulging due to I think the heat (I run clamshell mode and ambient temp on average is 30C) and the screen had slight discolouration.

Just think it's better for the lifespan of all the equipment if I can sleep properly.

X1 Yoga Gen3, X1 Tablet Gen 3, MacBook Pro 15" 2018
Razer Core X / Mantiz Venus
Asrock Radeon VII, Zotac Nvidia 1080Ti Amp Core Extreme, Powercolor Vega 56 reference (flashed to V64 bios)


screendor liked
ReplyQuote
themattod
(@themattod)
New Member
Joined: 7 months ago
 

Oh for sure. Hoping it'd only be needed as a short term solution.

Pending: Add my system information and expected eGPU configuration to my signature to give context to my posts


ReplyQuote
screendor
(@screendor)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

FWIW, no fan spin up on sleep on my rig.  Maybe it's not the card?  Using the Akitio Node Pro and everything quiet when the system sleeps.  That said, card does spin up on boot and shutdown until the computer is up or off, then it's quiet.  But that's only a few seconds or so.

2017 iMac 5K 4.2 GHz Intel Core i7 40 GB 2400 MHz
Internal AMD 580 Pro 8GB; Akitio Node Pro + AMD Radeon VII


ReplyQuote
(@peter_thaler)
Active Member
Joined: 8 months ago
 

I'm also experiencing perfect sleep behavior of the RadenVII in the Mantiz Venus. No problem with the fans on sleep/shutdown.

MacBook Pro (2017 13" Touch bar) Mojave 10.14.5 Beta / bootcamp Win10 1809 (+automate-eGPU EFI) - Mantiz Venus + AMD Radeon VII (Sapphire) - LG UHD 4k


ReplyQuote
 of  19