Setup & Software Discussions
Thunderbolt 2 fast enough to handle GPU?
 

Thunderbolt 2 fast enough to handle GPU?  

  RSS

OLEGPHOTO
(@olegphoto)
New Member
Joined: 5 months ago
 

I have a iMac 27'' Mid 2014 with only thunderbolt 2. I need a new GPU to handle Davinci Resolve 15 with Raw files.
I was thinking in buying the Blackmagic egpu (Radeon Pro 580) but it only works with thunderbolt 3. I was going to try it with an adapter.
Could this work ?
Any suggestions ?

Pending: Add my system information and expected eGPU configuration to my signature to give context to my posts


ReplyQuote
chinsteig
(@chinsteig)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 years ago
 

That should work, though you will have to do some workarounds to get it to work through TB2. I currently use a TB2 enclosure and it works great in Davinci Resolve 15.

Start here I guess:
https://egpu.io/setup-guide-external-graphics-card-mac/
https://egpu.io/forums/mac-setup/script-enable-egpu-on-tb1-2-macs-on-macos-10-13-4/

The easiest way would be to search the build guides to see if someone did something similar to yours that you can copy.

Mid 2012 15" MacBook Pro > Thunder2 > GTX 1070 > 34" 2560x1080 Ultrawide
Mid 2017 15" MacBook Pro > Thunder2 > GTX 1070 > 34" 2560x1080 Ultrawide


ReplyQuote
sabrefv
(@sabrefv)
Eminent Member
Joined: 6 months ago
 

I just connected a TB2 MacBook (MacBook air 13.3 early 2015 A1466 8GB RAM i5 5250U) to a TB3 enclosure (Sonnet egfx Breakaway 350W) and it works great. I used an apple TB3 to TB 2 adapter plugged into the enclosure and a TB2 cable from there to the TB2 port on the Macbook. I got good benchmarks and it was all plug and play . However, my build is installed on Bootcamp Windows 10 and I'm guessing you want to run Davinci Resolve on MAcOS.
If you look at these throughput specs you will see that you should still get good performance for TB2, TB3>TB2 (16Gb/s), however, I know nothing of Davinci Resolve.
https://egpu.io/builds/#perf

Lenovo Yoga 730, Dell XPS 13
Akitio Node, Gigabyte Aorus 1070
Sapphire Nitro RX 580, Nvidia GE Force GTX 1070


ReplyQuote
OLEGPHOTO
(@olegphoto)
New Member
Joined: 5 months ago
 

Thank you!

Pending: Add my system information and expected eGPU configuration to my signature to give context to my posts


ReplyQuote
(@irakly_shanidze)
New Member
Joined: 4 months ago
 

I am using a Sonnet Breakaway Box 550W with PowerColor AMD Vega 64 on my Trashcan Mac Pro. All it took was an Apple TB3-TB2 adapter, TB2 cable and running an enabler script found on this forum. Davinci Resolve Studio 15.3 renders 4K H.264 from ProRes HQ at 12-16fps, 1080p renders in real time. No hiccups on transitions on the Edit page. Fusion clips cause noticeable slowdown, so as noise reduction, as expected.

Mac Pro 2013, Intel Xeon 3.5GHz 6-core, 32GB ECC DDR, AMD FirePro D700
Sonnet Breakaway Box 550W, PowerColor Radeon Pro Vega 64


ReplyQuote
OliverB
(@oliverb)
Noble Member
Joined: 10 months ago
 

For most applications TB2 is easily good enough, unless you want to accelerate the internal display.

2018 15" MBP & 2015 13" MBP connected to RTX2080Ti GTX1080Ti GTX1080 Vega56 RX580 R9-290 GTX680


ReplyQuote
(@irakly_shanidze)
New Member
Joined: 4 months ago
 

I am running Sonnet Breakaway Box 550W with PowerColor Radeon Pro Vega 56 flashed to 64 on my trashcan Mac Pro, 3.5GHz, 32GB RAM, dual AMD FirePro D700, using Apple TB3-TB2 adapter. Everything works super smoothly, and I see a significant improvement in Davinci Resolve Studio performance (except, of course, for transcoding H.264, which is a processor-intensive task).

Out of curiosity I decided to see how it will perform on 2017 MacBook Pro 15", 16GB RAM, AMD Radeon Pro 560. The notebook was connected to Sonnet with Belkin 50cm TB3 cable. I expected that TB3 connection will make Vega fly, but to my surprise Davinci Resolve Studio did not seem to work any faster than on the Trashcan. Moreover, it was actually slower.

Knowing that Davinci Resolve Studio uses all available GPUs, I came up with a theory that two D700 GPUs on the Trashcan contributed more than one 560 on the laptop. To exclude confounding factors, I ran Metal Compute tests with Geekbench 4.3.1 on both machines, since Geekbench tests one GPU at a time. Here are the results:

Mac Pro 2013, Thunderbolt 2                 165073

Macbook Pro 2017 Thunderbolt 3         142503

Both tests were run without any applications running. Now, somebody tell me that two-fold Thunderbolt 3 performance increase makes any difference... 

Mac Pro 2013, Intel Xeon 3.5GHz 6-core, 32GB ECC DDR, AMD FirePro D700
Sonnet Breakaway Box 550W, PowerColor Radeon Pro Vega 64


ReplyQuote
MorphoV
(@morphov)
New Member
Joined: 2 months ago
 

Hi, 
@irakly_shanidze , did you flash the 56 with OSX? Tutorials I found so far are made on Windows machines.

Pending: Add my system information and expected eGPU configuration to my signature to give context to my posts


ReplyQuote