Honestly forgot my login for my old account so rolling out a new one.
Anyways a simple question. I have the options to purchase a used Razer Core v1 (~$125) or a used Core X (non-Chroma) (~$140).
I'm curious as to whether there is a significant difference in the chips used for the enclosures that might hinder performance/stability.
As for other specs, I'm running as follows:
Dell XPS 9575 i7-8705G 16GB DDR4
Nvidia EVGA 1080Ti SC2
Planning on running external io (keyboard/mouse) but not too bothered by running them on laptop ports
Thanks!
To do: Create my signature with system and expected eGPU configuration information to give context to my posts. I have no builds.
.
@sneeaky-2, Go with the Core X. Core V1 uses TI82 USB-C controller which doesn't have the best support. The Core X also has more internal room and higher PSU output.
LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook | Youtube | Instagram
• external graphics card builds
• best laptops for external GPU
• eGPU enclosure buyer's guide
2020 13" MacBook Pro [10th,4C,G] + RX 6700 XT @ 32Gbps-TB3 (CM MasterCase EG200) + Win10 1903 [build link]
Thanks for the advice! So essentially from an eGPU standpoint (other than room and power supply) there shouldn't be a difference?
As much as the internal room is nice, my GPU is a 2-slot ~300W peak card and I do travel some for work. My primary concerns are stability.
To do: Create my signature with system and expected eGPU configuration information to give context to my posts. I have no builds.
.